Wednesday 22nd May 2013
FTSE-GM---ticker-sponsor-logo-DB
European regulators said yesterday they will decide by June 24th whether to clear an $8.2bn takeover bid by IntercontinentalExchange for NYSE Euronext - Singapore state investor Tamasek has bought a stake in data provider Markit. The deal, which had been speculated on for the last two weeks, is reported to be worth $500m, securing Tamasek a 10% stake - Moscow Exchange began trading mortgage-backed participation certificates today, the first time such instruments have been traded on the Russian market - BlackRock is set to double the amount of money it has invested in real estate after reaching a deal to buy independently managed real-estate advisory business MGPA - Russian broker BCS Financial Group has bolstered its international sales and research teams with two new hires - JPMorgan will end its transition management operations in the US, Europe, Middle East and Africa - Emirates Islamic Financial Brokerage (EIFB), a major Shariah-compliant broker in the UAE, has become a member of Nasdaq Dubai, the region's international exchange. EIFB will focus on opportunities for trading Shariah-compliant shares listed on Nasdaq- Moody's Investors Service confirmed the ratings of Elan Corporation, plc ("Elan") including the Ba3 Corporate Family Rating and the Ba2-PD Probability of Default Rating. This concludes the rating review for downgrade initiated on May 13, 2013. At the same time, Moody's assigned a Ba3 rating to the new senior unsecured note offering of Elan Finance plc, guaranteed by Elan. The rating outlook is stable – According to data released by the National Bureau of Statistics(NBS) last Saturday, China's housing inflation accelerated to its fastest pace in April in two years, driven by a jump in prices in Beijing and Shanghai, complicating the task of policymakers trying to cool the property sector while supporting economic expansion. Average new home prices rose 4.9% last month from a year ago, after a year-on-year increase of 3.6%. The rise was the sharpest since April 2011 – S&P reiterated its negative outlook on India’s credit rating last Friday, despite a previous attempt by government officials to push for an upgrade in light of their actions to put India’s finances in order. India’s credit rating is BBB-, one notch above “junk” – JP Morgan Asset Management is to launch an investment company investing in convertible securities from a range of sectors, targeting income and the potential for long-term capital growth. Domiciled in Guernsey, the JPMorgan Global Convertibles Income Fund will be managed by the convertible bond team headed by Antony Vallee -ABS deals currently in the pipeline include: €800m Bavarian Sky German Auto Loans 1; $238m CarFinance Auto Receivables Trust 2013-1; $599.7m Edsouth Indenture No.4 Series 2013-1; and €300m Volta Electricity Receivables Securitisation – RMBS deals in hand include Firstmac Series 1E-2013 and £420.6m Kenrick No.2; $425m HLSS Servicer Advance Receivables Trust series 2013-T2 and $425m 2013-T3 – CMBS deals underway include the $510m JPMCC 2013-JWRZ and $1.47bn WFRBS 2013-C14 -

Blog

The European Review

By Patrick Artus, chief economist at Natixis

Target 2 accounts: The equivalent of currency interventions, and a very good indicator of the risk that the euro may break up

Wednesday, 20 June 2012 Written by 
Target 2 accounts: The equivalent of currency interventions, and a very good indicator of the risk that the euro may break upWhen the Bundesbank’s (Germany's) Target 2 account (which is positive) increases while another euro-zone country’s Target 2 account becomes more negative, this is equivalent to a German currency intervention aimed at stabilising the exchange rate between Germany and this other country, and therefore at preventing a break-up of the euro. In a completely similar manner, when China accumulates foreign exchange reserves in dollars to prevent an appreciation of the RMB, the People's Bank of China accumulates an asset and the United States a liability, and there is monetary creation (in RMB). So the size of the Target 2 accounts of the national central banks in the euro zone corresponds to the size of the foreign exchange reserves that the euro-zone countries with a strong currency have to accumulate to prevent a break-up of the euro; it is therefore a very good indicator of the risk of a break-up.http://www.ftseglobalmarkets.com/

When the Bundesbank’s (Germany's) Target 2 account (which is positive) increases while another euro-zone country’s Target 2 account becomes more negative, this is equivalent to a German currency intervention aimed at stabilising the exchange rate between Germany and this other country, and therefore at preventing a break-up of the euro. In a completely similar manner, when China accumulates foreign exchange reserves in dollars to prevent an appreciation of the RMB, the People's Bank of China accumulates an asset and the United States a liability, and there is monetary creation (in RMB). So the size of the Target 2 accounts of the national central banks in the euro zone corresponds to the size of the foreign exchange reserves that the euro-zone countries with a "strong currency" have to accumulate to prevent a break-up of the euro; it is therefore a very good indicator of the risk of a break-up.

The size of the Target 2 accounts held by national central banks in the euro zone

Germany and the Netherlands hold substantial Target 2 assets (respectively EUR 650bn and EUR 140bn), while Greece, Spain, Italy and Ireland have substantial Target 2 debts (respectively EUR 98bn, EUR 285bn, EUR 280bn and EUR 117bn).



Fundamentally, these are currency interventions

Let us take, for example, the Germany/Spain pair. If the Bundesbank lends to the Bank of Spain, there is an increase in Germany's positive Target 2 account and in Spain’s negative Target 2 account. This corresponds to a loan from Germany to Spain, or to a purchase of Spanish assets by the German central bank.

If this purchase had not taken place, Spain would be unable to finance its external deficit, and would be forced to pull out of the euro and let its currency depreciate to the point where capital inflows covered its external borrowing requirement.

Therefore, this is the exact equivalent of a currency intervention aimed at ensuring the stability of the exchange rate between Germany and Spain: the country with a "strong currency" buys assets of the country with a "weak currency" to stabilise the exchange rate.

Similarity with the China/United States pair

When China accumulates foreign exchange reserves in dollars to prevent an excessive appreciation of the RMB against the dollar, the People's Bank of China holds US assets and the United States, conversely, has a debt to China.

This operation increases the size of the balance sheet of the People's Bank of China, and therefore leads to monetary creation.

Likewise, when the Bundesbank lends to central banks in the Southern euro-zone countries, and these central banks subsequently lend these funds to the banks in their own countries, there is a creation of monetary base in euros.

Target 2 accounts measure the risk of a break-up of the euro

The size (positive or negative according to the country) of the Target 2 accounts held by the central banks in the euro zone therefore represents the size of the foreign exchange reserves that the euro zone countries with a "strong currency" have to accumulate to ensure the euro’s sustainability ("exchange-rate stability" between euro zone countries). The more the size of these accounts increases, the higher the risk that the euro may break-up.

Positive Target 2 accounts surged from the summer of 2011, and this went hand in hand with a period of pressure on the interest rates on peripheral government bonds and on risk premia on banks.

Patrick Artus

A graduate of Ecole Polytechnique, of Ecole Nationale de la Statistique et de l'Adminstration Economique and of Institut d'Etudes Politiques de Paris, Patrick Artus is today the Chief Economist at Natixis. He began his career in 1975 where his work included economic forecasting and modelisation. He then worked at the Economics Department of the OECD (1980), before becoming Head of Research at the ENSAE. Thereafter, Patrick taught seminars on research at Paris Dauphine (1982) and was Professor at a number of Universities (including Dauphine, ENSAE, Centre des Hautes Etudes de l'Armement, Ecole Nationale des Ponts et Chaussées and HEC Lausanne).

Patrick is now Professor of Economics at University Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne. He combines these responsibilities with his research work at Natixis. Patrick was awarded "Best Economist of the year 1996" by the "Nouvel Economiste", and today is a member of the council of economic advisors to the French Prime Minister. He is also a board member at Total and Ipsos.

Website: cib.natixis.com/research/economic.aspx

Give vital input into our June 2013 Collateral Management roundtable, sponsored by Clearstream.

Please answer the following questions:

clearstream logo

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Related News

Related Articles

Related Blogs