Thursday 18th December 2014
NEWS TICKER: WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 16TH 2014: GEA Group Aktiengesellschaft is one of the largest suppliers for the food processing industry, following the sale of the Heat Exchangers Segment at the end of October this year, Klaus Hunger, chairman of the General Works Council of the former GEA Heat Exchangers Segment, has announced his retirement from the GEA Group Supervisory Board. By order of the local court of Düsseldorf, Brigitte Krönchen, deputy chair of the GEA Farm Technologies Works Council, was appointed to the as the new employee representative. - On a seasonally adjusted basis, the US Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers declined 0.3% in November after being unchanged in October, according to the Bureau of Labor. The index for all items less food and energy increased 0.1% last month after rising 0.2%in October - Methorios Capital, an Italian based independent financial services company, has listed on the Alternext market in Paris, with the direct listing of the existing 133,436,181 shares. The admission price of Methorios Capital shares was set at €0.63 per share. Market capitalisation was €84.1mon on its debut. Fabio Palumbo, Chairman of Methorios Capital, says “This listing allows the company to increase its international visibility, the share liquidity and guarantee new capital raising opportunities to finance its growth.” - Nasdaq today announced that LifeSci Index Partners, LLC, will list two new exchange-traded funds, the BioSharesTM Biotechnology Clinical Trials Fund (Symbol: BBC) and the BioSharesTM Biotechnology Products Fund (Symbol: BBP), on The Nasdaq Stock Market. BBC and BBP will begin trading today. "The landscape of the biotechnology sector has experienced dramatic shifts since the initial public offerings of Cetus and Genentech in the early 1980s," says Paul Yook, co-founder of LifeSci Index Partners. "Our BioShares funds are designed with the current biotechnology market in mind and offer investors unique and diversified portfolios of entrepreneurial biotechnology stocks by applying our rules-based index methodology." Both funds employ an equal weighting approach that allows each security's performance to affect the ETF equally, regardless of the size of the company. In this way, a relatively small firm enjoying a major breakthrough can have a meaningful impact on the ETF. An equal weighting also serves to minimize the outsize impact that a handful of mega-cap biotech companies can have on more traditional, market-cap weighted indexes. - According to Platon Monokroussos, head of research at Eurobank, “Taking their cue from the negative tone in Asia earlier today, major European stock markets stood in a negative territory in early trade on Wednesday pressured by persisting Russia jitters and the continued downtrend in oil prices amid oversupply concerns. The FOMC holds its final meeting of the year today. The policy announcement is scheduled for 20:00 CET and market focus is on whether the FOMC will drop its commitment “to maintain the 0 to ¼% target range for the federal funds rate for a considerable time following the end of its asset purchase program” - The first round of voting for the election of the new President of the Hellenic Republic in the 300-seat Parliament is scheduled to take place this evening at 19:00 Athens time (EET). As per Article 32 of the Constitution of Greece, a 2/3rd majority of the number of seats is required for the election of the new President i.e., 200 in-favour votes. Recall that Greece’s two-party coalition government currently enjoys the support of 155 lawmakers; center-right New Democracy controls 127 seats and PASOK 28. The coalition government has nominated former EU Commissioner Stavros Dimas for the presidential post – The UK’s Water Services Regulation Authority's (Ofwat’s) final determination on price limits for UK water companies over the forthcoming five-year control period 2015-20, which was announced on December 12th, remains challenging but in line with expectations, says Moody's in a report published today. The main difference is a further 10 basis-point reduction in the allowed wholesale return, resulting in an overall allowed return for the business as a whole (including wholesale and retail activities) of 3.74%, compared with 3.85% in the draft determination and 5.1% in the current period. However, the ratings agency says negative implications of the additional 10 basis-point reduction are somewhat offset by other positive changes from the draft determination stage, including an adjustment for cost inflation on retail cost allowances from 2012-13 to 2013-14. Moody's notes that United Utilities Water Limited (A3 stable) and Thames Water Utilities Ltd (Baa1 negative) benefitted from significant changes to their overall total expenditure allowances between draft and final determination, and, in the case of Thames Water, a company-specific uncertainty mechanism related to the Thames Tideway Tunnel project. Similarly, Moody’s says Southern Water Services Limited (Baa2 negative) achieved a significant improvement in the legacy adjustment related to its performance in the current regulatory period. Conversely, Bristol Water plc (Baa1 stable) remains the relative loser of the final determination, as it faces the largest relative reduction in wholesale total expenditure allowance compared with the company's plan. The gap between Bristol Water's proposed wholesale total expenditure versus Ofwat's final determination allowances is 32%, making a referral to the Competition and Markets Authority likely – Bloomberg reports that Jefferies Group is moving to shed the commodities and financial-derivatives business that it bought from Prudential Bache in 2011. Jefferies says it's getting out of the business because of high costs and dwindling fees – California’s SunEdison, Inc says it has closed its second fund for distributed solar photovoltaic (PV) generation projects in the United States with Barclays and Citi. The lease pass-through fund is valued at $117m, and follows on the Barclays and Citi fund closed earlier this year. This brings the aggregate value of funds closed this year with Barclays and Citi for SunEdison and TerraForm Power's distributed generation projects to $290m. The fund will provide financing for a portfolio of distributed generation PV projects in 12 states across the West Coast, mid-Atlantic, New England, Hawaii and Puerto Rico. The projects are expected to be operational in the fourth quarter of 2014 through the first half of 2015. Upon mechanical completion, the projects will be sold to TerraForm Power – Emolument.com, the salary benchmarking site has examined bonus data from 322 VPs working in front office in Asset Management in Europe. It finds London’s salaries are the highest –with a strong culture of incentivising staff, “bonuses in London are the chunkiest in Europe” says the firm. However, salaries are higher in Geneva (at a 23% premium to London). VPs in Amsterdam earn as much as those in Paris says the firm - According Sino news service Red Pulse, Baidu will invest $600m in the taxi start-up, marking the tech giant’s official entry into the taxi app space, a year after Tencent and Alibaba announced their investments in taxi apps DidiTaxi and Kuaidi Taxi respectively. This recent acquisition marks yet another push from Baidu to compete in the mobile payment and O2O market sectors. Baidu launched its third-party payment platform, Baidu Wallet, in April 2014, competing with Alibaba’s Alipay and Tencent’s Tenpay platforms. Baidu also has an investment in the travel website Qunar, which in addition to Baidu Wallet, also offers the option for payment through other platforms. Some industry sources believe that this new investment will be no different and that Uber will likely remain open to other payment channels. Even if this is not the case, Baidu Wallet will continue to face considerable hurdles. While the company has grown a strong client base through its mapping app, it has yet to prove that it can transform passive consumers to active ones, willing to make a purchase through its platform - Russia continues to take a beating in the FX trading markets. The depreciation of the Ruble this year is unprecedented and while it has also put pressure on other emerging market currencies, Russia is the fall guy in today’s markets, while the USD and JPY are both benefactors of safe haven investment flows. The euro found its footing as it attempted to rally back above 1.2500 following better than expected PMI readings and a huge jump in the German ZEW economic sentiment survey, though it is looking toppy and selling is now expected - UK economic news flow has tended to be better than analysts expect over the last couple of months and aside from a very downbeat inflation report and inflation expectations, the rest of the economy is maintaining a firm pace of growth. The issue however is the role inflation plays in the BOE’s policy outlook, currently inflation at 1% is well below the BOE’s target of 2%, and concerns are inflation will decline further before recovering, this is likely to impact the BOE’s progression to raising interest rates and as such will have ongoing implication on the value of GBP. For now GBP is marginally firmer on the morning.

Blog

The European Review

By Patrick Artus, chief economist at Natixis

The Calculation for Spain

Tuesday, 31 July 2012 Written by 
The Calculation for Spain To alleviate its debt and escape its state of crisis, we think Spain has two strategies to choose from. The first one, already in place since 2009, involves a reduction in the fiscal and external deficits while accepting aid from other eurozone countries. If Spain were to continue with this strategy, it would need to incorporate regular debt purchases by the ECB and possibly the ESM, and provide assistance to recapitalise its banks. The second strategy would be to leave the euro, which would mean a default on its gross external debt and a sharp devaluation of its currency. Both of these strategies contain negatives that need to be considered: the question is, which one would be the least detrimental to the country’s economic future? http://www.ftseglobalmarkets.com/

To alleviate its debt and escape its state of crisis, we think Spain has two strategies to choose from. The first one, already in place since 2009, involves a reduction in the fiscal and external deficits while accepting aid from other eurozone countries. If Spain were to continue with this strategy, it would need to incorporate regular debt purchases by the ECB and possibly the ESM, and provide assistance to recapitalise its banks.

The second strategy would be to leave the euro, which would mean a default on its gross external debt and a sharp devaluation of its currency.

Both of these strategies contain negatives that need to be considered: the question is, which one would be the least detrimental to the country’s economic future?

Strategy One: Spain's present strategy of adjustment...A Catch-22 situation?

Spain’s high levels of external debt mean it cannot increase its external borrowing (except for emergency borrowing from the EU or the ECB). Therefore, it must balance its current account.



Its present strategy of adjustment is clear: a restrictive fiscal policy; an improvement in cost-competitiveness to rebalance foreign trade; and the acceptance of European aid to recapitalise banks in distress. The last action hinges on purchases of government bonds to push down long-term interest rates. However, this strategy is risky.

A scenario may help us better understand this strategy: a fall in real wages due to price-stickiness discourages household demand, which has a knock-on effect to make business investment decline. Hence, there is a major decline in domestic demand and activity, making it very difficult to reduce fiscal deficit. In early 2012 we saw this in action when Spain’s fiscal deficit widened considerably, due both to tax revenue short-falls and higher-than-expected government spending. A continuation of this strategy therefore may lead to a further increase in unemployment and a decline in activity.

There could also be a reduction in the external deficit due to the decline in purchasing power. That said, imports would have to be reduced by a further 20% for Spain's current account deficit to disappear, which would mean a decline of at least 12% in domestic demand and real income.

The only hope for this strategy is that improvements in cost-competitiveness could increase Spain's exports and market share, and improved profits could eventually increase business investment.

Strategy Two: Exit from the euro, default and devaluation...A possible solution or suicide?

The other strategy would be for Spain to leave the euro, sharply devalue its currency, and inevitably default on its gross external public and private debt. This would obviously be a big problem for Spanish multinational companies, given the size of debt and the impossibility of servicing it following devaluation.

But what would the likely consequences of this strategy be?

For a start, it requires an immediate rebalancing of foreign trade. The country could no longer borrow, which would result in a much weaker economic situation in the short term.

Our econometric estimate shows elasticity to the real exchange rate of 0.73 for Spain's exports and 0 for imports, in volume terms. If we assume 30% devaluation, the foreign trade gain in volume terms would be 7.7 percentage points of GDP, which is very substantial.

Devaluation would increase the price of imports and therefore reduce real income by about 5.9 percentage points, which would leave a net gain of approximately 2 percentage points of GDP.

When the Spanish peseta was devalued in the early 1990s (twice in 1992, once in 1993), the current account deficit disappeared in 18 months, exports accelerated strongly, while domestic inflation reacted only slightly to the rise in import prices. The decline in GDP only lasted one year, and from that point growth was strong because of falling interest rates.

In today’s instance, devaluation would also increase the competitiveness of tourism and increase the surplus for these services in local currency, though perhaps not in foreign currencies such as the euro.

As financing becomes completely domestic, it is not impossible that there could be a reduction in the sovereign risk premium.

Devaluation could subsequently attract direct investment by businesses. With 30% devaluation, for example, labour costs in Spain would fall to EUR 14 per hour, 60% less than in Germany. However, since the size of Spanish industry is relatively small, new activities need to be considered for it to generate a large surplus.

Conclusion: What strategy to choose for Spain?

If the improvement in Spain's cost-competitiveness and profitability does not produce quick results, the present strategy will fail: wages would have to be reduced on a greater scale to eliminate the external deficit, and the fiscal deficit would remain very high.

The other strategy (leaving the euro, devaluation and default) could be successful if the devaluation attracted new activities, but it involves a lot of uncertainties – such as the impacts on Spanish multinationals, interest rates and foreign trade.

As stated earlier, both strategies are rather bleak, but positive aspects are still evident. Considering all of the factors, we believe that the strategy of devaluation and default could be the most efficient, particularly due to the high price elasticity of exports and the fact that Spain's entire current account deficit is accounted for by the interest on its external debt. As in 1992, it could also be effective due to the domestic financing of fiscal deficits, which will prevent a rise in interest rates.

Patrick Artus

A graduate of Ecole Polytechnique, of Ecole Nationale de la Statistique et de l'Adminstration Economique and of Institut d'Etudes Politiques de Paris, Patrick Artus is today the Chief Economist at Natixis. He began his career in 1975 where his work included economic forecasting and modelisation. He then worked at the Economics Department of the OECD (1980), before becoming Head of Research at the ENSAE. Thereafter, Patrick taught seminars on research at Paris Dauphine (1982) and was Professor at a number of Universities (including Dauphine, ENSAE, Centre des Hautes Etudes de l'Armement, Ecole Nationale des Ponts et Chaussées and HEC Lausanne).

Patrick is now Professor of Economics at University Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne. He combines these responsibilities with his research work at Natixis. Patrick was awarded "Best Economist of the year 1996" by the "Nouvel Economiste", and today is a member of the council of economic advisors to the French Prime Minister. He is also a board member at Total and Ipsos.

Website: cib.natixis.com/research/economic.aspx

Related News

Related Articles

Related Blogs

Tweets by @DataLend

DataLend is a global securities finance market data provider covering 42,000+ unique securities globally with a total on-loan value of more than $1.8 trillion.

What do our tweets mean? See: http://bit.ly/18YlGjP