Thursday 18th December 2014
NEWS TICKER: WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 16TH 2014: GEA Group Aktiengesellschaft is one of the largest suppliers for the food processing industry, following the sale of the Heat Exchangers Segment at the end of October this year, Klaus Hunger, chairman of the General Works Council of the former GEA Heat Exchangers Segment, has announced his retirement from the GEA Group Supervisory Board. By order of the local court of Düsseldorf, Brigitte Krönchen, deputy chair of the GEA Farm Technologies Works Council, was appointed to the as the new employee representative. - On a seasonally adjusted basis, the US Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers declined 0.3% in November after being unchanged in October, according to the Bureau of Labor. The index for all items less food and energy increased 0.1% last month after rising 0.2%in October - Methorios Capital, an Italian based independent financial services company, has listed on the Alternext market in Paris, with the direct listing of the existing 133,436,181 shares. The admission price of Methorios Capital shares was set at €0.63 per share. Market capitalisation was €84.1mon on its debut. Fabio Palumbo, Chairman of Methorios Capital, says “This listing allows the company to increase its international visibility, the share liquidity and guarantee new capital raising opportunities to finance its growth.” - Nasdaq today announced that LifeSci Index Partners, LLC, will list two new exchange-traded funds, the BioSharesTM Biotechnology Clinical Trials Fund (Symbol: BBC) and the BioSharesTM Biotechnology Products Fund (Symbol: BBP), on The Nasdaq Stock Market. BBC and BBP will begin trading today. "The landscape of the biotechnology sector has experienced dramatic shifts since the initial public offerings of Cetus and Genentech in the early 1980s," says Paul Yook, co-founder of LifeSci Index Partners. "Our BioShares funds are designed with the current biotechnology market in mind and offer investors unique and diversified portfolios of entrepreneurial biotechnology stocks by applying our rules-based index methodology." Both funds employ an equal weighting approach that allows each security's performance to affect the ETF equally, regardless of the size of the company. In this way, a relatively small firm enjoying a major breakthrough can have a meaningful impact on the ETF. An equal weighting also serves to minimize the outsize impact that a handful of mega-cap biotech companies can have on more traditional, market-cap weighted indexes. - According to Platon Monokroussos, head of research at Eurobank, “Taking their cue from the negative tone in Asia earlier today, major European stock markets stood in a negative territory in early trade on Wednesday pressured by persisting Russia jitters and the continued downtrend in oil prices amid oversupply concerns. The FOMC holds its final meeting of the year today. The policy announcement is scheduled for 20:00 CET and market focus is on whether the FOMC will drop its commitment “to maintain the 0 to ¼% target range for the federal funds rate for a considerable time following the end of its asset purchase program” - The first round of voting for the election of the new President of the Hellenic Republic in the 300-seat Parliament is scheduled to take place this evening at 19:00 Athens time (EET). As per Article 32 of the Constitution of Greece, a 2/3rd majority of the number of seats is required for the election of the new President i.e., 200 in-favour votes. Recall that Greece’s two-party coalition government currently enjoys the support of 155 lawmakers; center-right New Democracy controls 127 seats and PASOK 28. The coalition government has nominated former EU Commissioner Stavros Dimas for the presidential post – The UK’s Water Services Regulation Authority's (Ofwat’s) final determination on price limits for UK water companies over the forthcoming five-year control period 2015-20, which was announced on December 12th, remains challenging but in line with expectations, says Moody's in a report published today. The main difference is a further 10 basis-point reduction in the allowed wholesale return, resulting in an overall allowed return for the business as a whole (including wholesale and retail activities) of 3.74%, compared with 3.85% in the draft determination and 5.1% in the current period. However, the ratings agency says negative implications of the additional 10 basis-point reduction are somewhat offset by other positive changes from the draft determination stage, including an adjustment for cost inflation on retail cost allowances from 2012-13 to 2013-14. Moody's notes that United Utilities Water Limited (A3 stable) and Thames Water Utilities Ltd (Baa1 negative) benefitted from significant changes to their overall total expenditure allowances between draft and final determination, and, in the case of Thames Water, a company-specific uncertainty mechanism related to the Thames Tideway Tunnel project. Similarly, Moody’s says Southern Water Services Limited (Baa2 negative) achieved a significant improvement in the legacy adjustment related to its performance in the current regulatory period. Conversely, Bristol Water plc (Baa1 stable) remains the relative loser of the final determination, as it faces the largest relative reduction in wholesale total expenditure allowance compared with the company's plan. The gap between Bristol Water's proposed wholesale total expenditure versus Ofwat's final determination allowances is 32%, making a referral to the Competition and Markets Authority likely – Bloomberg reports that Jefferies Group is moving to shed the commodities and financial-derivatives business that it bought from Prudential Bache in 2011. Jefferies says it's getting out of the business because of high costs and dwindling fees – California’s SunEdison, Inc says it has closed its second fund for distributed solar photovoltaic (PV) generation projects in the United States with Barclays and Citi. The lease pass-through fund is valued at $117m, and follows on the Barclays and Citi fund closed earlier this year. This brings the aggregate value of funds closed this year with Barclays and Citi for SunEdison and TerraForm Power's distributed generation projects to $290m. The fund will provide financing for a portfolio of distributed generation PV projects in 12 states across the West Coast, mid-Atlantic, New England, Hawaii and Puerto Rico. The projects are expected to be operational in the fourth quarter of 2014 through the first half of 2015. Upon mechanical completion, the projects will be sold to TerraForm Power – Emolument.com, the salary benchmarking site has examined bonus data from 322 VPs working in front office in Asset Management in Europe. It finds London’s salaries are the highest –with a strong culture of incentivising staff, “bonuses in London are the chunkiest in Europe” says the firm. However, salaries are higher in Geneva (at a 23% premium to London). VPs in Amsterdam earn as much as those in Paris says the firm - According Sino news service Red Pulse, Baidu will invest $600m in the taxi start-up, marking the tech giant’s official entry into the taxi app space, a year after Tencent and Alibaba announced their investments in taxi apps DidiTaxi and Kuaidi Taxi respectively. This recent acquisition marks yet another push from Baidu to compete in the mobile payment and O2O market sectors. Baidu launched its third-party payment platform, Baidu Wallet, in April 2014, competing with Alibaba’s Alipay and Tencent’s Tenpay platforms. Baidu also has an investment in the travel website Qunar, which in addition to Baidu Wallet, also offers the option for payment through other platforms. Some industry sources believe that this new investment will be no different and that Uber will likely remain open to other payment channels. Even if this is not the case, Baidu Wallet will continue to face considerable hurdles. While the company has grown a strong client base through its mapping app, it has yet to prove that it can transform passive consumers to active ones, willing to make a purchase through its platform - Russia continues to take a beating in the FX trading markets. The depreciation of the Ruble this year is unprecedented and while it has also put pressure on other emerging market currencies, Russia is the fall guy in today’s markets, while the USD and JPY are both benefactors of safe haven investment flows. The euro found its footing as it attempted to rally back above 1.2500 following better than expected PMI readings and a huge jump in the German ZEW economic sentiment survey, though it is looking toppy and selling is now expected - UK economic news flow has tended to be better than analysts expect over the last couple of months and aside from a very downbeat inflation report and inflation expectations, the rest of the economy is maintaining a firm pace of growth. The issue however is the role inflation plays in the BOE’s policy outlook, currently inflation at 1% is well below the BOE’s target of 2%, and concerns are inflation will decline further before recovering, this is likely to impact the BOE’s progression to raising interest rates and as such will have ongoing implication on the value of GBP. For now GBP is marginally firmer on the morning.

Blog

The European Review

By Patrick Artus, chief economist at Natixis

What kind of economy would the euro zone be without Germany?

Thursday, 28 June 2012 Written by 
What kind of economy would the euro zone be without Germany? There is increasing talk about establishing federalist mechanisms (eurobonds, eurobills) and pooling certain risks and investments between euro-zone countries (European bank guarantees, recapitalisation of banks by the EFSF-ESM, increased investments by the EIB, EFSF-ESM access to ECB funding, purchases of government bonds by the ECB). Germany's criticism of these proposals is that they ultimately place all the costs and all the risks on Germany, due to its economic, fiscal and financial situation and its credibility in financial markets. It is claimed that eventually all the bills will be sent to Germany, since the other euro area countries have no fiscal or financial leeway or any credibility to guarantee deposits and loans. We shall therefore examine the economy of the euro zone excluding Germany and ask the question: Is it in such a bad situation that federalism or the pooling of risks and investments between euro-zone countries would in fact amount to potentially placing the entire burden on Germany? We think that Germany’s fears are justified. http://www.ftseglobalmarkets.com/

There is increasing talk about establishing federalist mechanisms (eurobonds, eurobills) and pooling certain risks and investments between euro-zone countries (European bank guarantees, recapitalisation of banks by the EFSF-ESM, increased investments by the EIB, EFSF-ESM access to ECB funding, purchases of government bonds by the ECB). Germany's criticism of these proposals is that they ultimately place all the costs and all the risks on Germany, due to its economic, fiscal and financial situation and its credibility in financial markets. It is claimed that eventually all the bills will be sent to Germany, since the other euro area countries have no fiscal or financial leeway or any credibility to guarantee deposits and loans.

We shall therefore examine the economy of the euro zone excluding Germany and ask the question: Is it in such a bad situation that federalism or the pooling of risks and investments between euro-zone countries would in fact amount to potentially placing the entire burden on Germany?

We think that Germany’s fears are justified.

Federalism: pooling between euro-zone countries

The resolution of the euro-zone crisis will inevitably involve establishing certain forms of federalism (eurobonds, eurobills) and the pooling of certain investments and risks (a European bank guarantee system, the recapitalisation of the banks (e.g. Spanish banks) by the EFSF-ESM, an increase in structural funds or investments by the EIB, ESM access to ECB funding).



The pooling of risks between euro-zone countries already exists: the Target 2 accounts are a pooling of bank risks among euro-zone central banks, and purchases of government bonds by the ECB pool sovereign risk.

This trend to federalism and pooling is inevitable: in a monetary union without federalism, countries with external surpluses and countries with external deficits cannot coexist permanently due to the resulting accumulation of external debt.

A number of financing needs are too substantial to be borne by a single country, e.g. for Spain the need for recapitalisation of its banks. And a number of risks (e.g. the risk of a bank run) are also too great not to be pooled.

Is this move towards federalism and pooling a trap for Germany?

The view in Germany is clearly that this move towards federalism and pooling is a trap for Germany. It is claimed that Germany will have to cover most of the costs because it has public finances in good health, growth that is now stronger, higher living standards than the countries in distress, and excess savings.

Germany also has strong credibility in financial markets, as shown by its interest rate level, and it is the only country to be able to credibly insure risks and guarantee loans.

The Germans' concern is therefore understandable: if there is federalism and a pooling of investments and risks, will Germany "receive all the bills"?

To determine whether this is a real risk, let’s examine the situation of the euro zone without Germany: is it such a worrying region, will it have to be propped up permanently by Germany?

The economic and financial situation of the euro zone without Germany: Is it serious?

Without going into greater detail for each country, we shall examine:

·                   its competitiveness, the foreign trade situation; the weight of industry;

·                   its situation regarding its technological level, skills, productivity and investment; its potential growth;

·                   the situation of its businesses and households;

·                   its public finances.

1. Foreign trade, competitiveness, weight of industry

The euro zone without Germany has:

·                   a structural external deficit;

·                   a shortfall in competitiveness;

·                   a small industrial base;

·                   a large external debt.

2. Technological level, skills, investment, productivity and potential growth, capacity for job creation

The technological level of the euro zone without Germany is fairly low, as is the population's level of education; this zone invests little, has low productivity gains, and since 2008 it has destroyed jobs massively.

3. Situation of businesses and households

Corporate profitability in the euro zone excluding Germany is low, but private (corporate and household) debt is lower than in Germany; however, household solvency has deteriorated (in Germany, household defaults are low and stable; in France, Spain and Italy, they are high and rising).

4. Public finance situation

The public finances of the euro zone excluding Germany are in a very poor state compared with Germany. Indeed Germany’s debt to GDP ratio is expected to fall, while in the euro zone excluding Germany it should rise rapidly toward 100%; Germany has a 1% primary surplus, while the euro zone excluding Germany has a 2% primary deficit.

Conclusion: Are the German fears justified?

If the euro zone were to become a federal monetary union, with solidarity between countries and pooling of certain investments (recapitalisation of banks, for example) and risks, surely the rest of the euro zone excluding Germany could only be:

·                   benefiting from transfers from Germany;

·                   benefiting from Germany's credibility in the markets;

·                   benefiting from Germany's guarantee;

Or could it share this burden with Germany? We suspect that the burden on Germany would be very heavy.

Patrick Artus

A graduate of Ecole Polytechnique, of Ecole Nationale de la Statistique et de l'Adminstration Economique and of Institut d'Etudes Politiques de Paris, Patrick Artus is today the Chief Economist at Natixis. He began his career in 1975 where his work included economic forecasting and modelisation. He then worked at the Economics Department of the OECD (1980), before becoming Head of Research at the ENSAE. Thereafter, Patrick taught seminars on research at Paris Dauphine (1982) and was Professor at a number of Universities (including Dauphine, ENSAE, Centre des Hautes Etudes de l'Armement, Ecole Nationale des Ponts et Chaussées and HEC Lausanne).

Patrick is now Professor of Economics at University Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne. He combines these responsibilities with his research work at Natixis. Patrick was awarded "Best Economist of the year 1996" by the "Nouvel Economiste", and today is a member of the council of economic advisors to the French Prime Minister. He is also a board member at Total and Ipsos.

Website: cib.natixis.com/research/economic.aspx

Related News

Related Articles

Related Blogs

Related Videos

Tweets by @DataLend

DataLend is a global securities finance market data provider covering 42,000+ unique securities globally with a total on-loan value of more than $1.8 trillion.

What do our tweets mean? See: http://bit.ly/18YlGjP