Sunday 21st September 2014
slib33
FRIDAY SEPTEMBER 19th TICKER: Scotland has decided to stay in the United Kingdom after voters rejected independence, easing investor uncertainty around UK stocks, gilts, and the country’s use of GBP. The bid for independence failed by a margin of 10%, with the results in from all 32 council areas, the ‘No’ side won with 2,001,926 votes over 1,617,989 for ‘Yes’ - Confidence at India’s largest companies hit a record high in September, as firms reported an easing in inflationary pressures and improved credit availability. The MNI India Business Indicator, calculated from responses from BSE listed companies, rose by 2.8 points to 71.2 in September from 68.4 in August - Italy is struggling to emerge from a balance sheet recession, according to the International Monetary Fund (IMF), although business surveys and resilient exports suggest a gradual increase in economic activity in coming quarters - Data from analytics provider eVestment shows total assets in hedge funds increased 1.6% in August to $3.068trn, overtaking the all-time peak level set prior to July’s slight decline.

IOSCO consults on liquidity risk management for collective investment schemes

Thursday, 26 April 2012
IOSCO consults on liquidity risk management for collective investment schemes The Technical Committee of the International Organisation of Securities Commissions has published the consultation report Principles of Liquidity Risk Management for Collective Investment Schemes, which outlines a set of principles against which both the industry and regulators can assess the quality of regulation and industry practices relating to liquidity risk management for collective investment schemes (CIS).  http://www.ftseglobalmarkets.com/

The Technical Committee of the International Organisation of Securities Commissions has published the consultation report Principles of Liquidity Risk Management for Collective Investment Schemes, which outlines a set of principles against which both the industry and regulators can assess the quality of regulation and industry practices relating to liquidity risk management for collective investment schemes (CIS). 

The Technical Committee of the International Organisation of Securities Commissions has outlined a set of principles against which both the industry and regulators can assess the quality of regulation and industry practices relating to liquidity risk management for collective investment schemes (CIS).   

Since the outbreak of the global financial crisis, the issue of liquidity has been a major concern for regulators, although the discussions on regulatory reform have focused more on the importance of liquidity in the banking sector rather than in other sectors. However, the asset management sector has specificities to be kept in mind when setting policy recommendations.

 Good liquidity risk management is a key feature of the correct operation of a CIS, as the right to redeem units/shares is a defining characteristic of open-ended schemes. Liquidity risk management is complex and a CIS may experience liquidity issues as, for example, when the market in which it is invested closes unexpectedly. However, asset managers have regulatory and practical tools to manage liquidity both on the asset side and on the investor side.  In exceptional circumstances, a liquidity issue could lead to a CIS temporarily suspending all investor redemptions. IOSCO recently published the report Principles on Suspensions of Redemptions in Collective Investment Schemes addressing this issue.

The fundamental requirement of liquidity risk management is to ensure that the degree of liquidity that the open-ended CIS manages allows it in general to meet redemption obligations and other liabilities.  The principles of liquidity risk management provide details on how compliance with this requirement can be achieved. Generally, these principles aim to reflect a level of common approach and to be a practical guide for regulators and industry practitioners. Implementation of the principles may vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, depending on local circumstances and legal and regulatory structures.

The principles of liquidity risk management for CIS

 The principles of liquidity risk management for CIS are divided into two groups related to the life span of a CIS: the pre-launch and the day-to-day liquidity risk management. They include the following:

 Principle 1

The responsible entity should draw up an effective liquidity risk management process, compliant with local jurisdictional liquidity requirements

 Principle 2

The responsible entity should set appropriate liquidity limits which are proportionate to the redemption obligations and liabilities of the CIS

 Principle 3

The responsible entity should carefully determine a suitable dealing frequency for units in the CIS  

 Principle 4

Where permissible and appropriate for a particular CIS, and in the interests of investors, the responsible entity should include the ability to use specific tools or exceptional measures which could affect redemption rights in the CIS’s constitutional documents

 Principle 5

The responsible entity should consider liquidity aspects related to its proposed distribution channels

 Principle 6

The responsible entity should ensure that it will have access to, or can effectively estimate, relevant information for liquidity management

 Principle 7

The responsible entity should ensure that liquidity risk and its liquidity risk management process are effectively disclosed to prospective investors

 Principle 8

The responsible entity should effectively perform and maintain its liquidity risk management process

 Principle 9

The responsible entity’s liquidity risk management process must be supported by strong and effective governance

 Principle 10

The responsible entity should regularly assess the liquidity of the assets held in the portfolio

  Principle 11

The responsible entity should integrate liquidity management in investment decisions

Principle 12

The liquidity risk management process should facilitate the ability of the responsible entity to identify an emerging liquidity shortage before it occurs

 Principle 13

The responsible entity should be able to incorporate relevant data and factors into its liquidity risk management process in order to create a robust and holistic view of the possible risks

 Principle 14

The responsible entity should conduct assessments of liquidity in different scenarios, including stressed situations

 Principle 15

The responsible entity should ensure appropriate records are kept, and relevant disclosures made, relating to the performance of its liquidity risk management process

Related News

Related Articles

Related Blogs

Related Videos

Tweets by @DataLend

DataLend is a global securities finance market data provider covering 42,000+ unique securities globally with a total on-loan value of more than $1.8 trillion.

What do our tweets mean? See: http://bit.ly/18YlGjP

White Paper

Seeking Optimal ETF Execution in Electronic Markets

Seeking Optimal ETF Execution in Electronic Markets

 
pdf Download PDF View all Whitepapers