Thursday 31st July 2014
slib33
TICKER - WEDNESDAY - JULY 30th: Avanti Mining Inc has entered into a debt financing mandate letter with a syndicate of six lenders to provide secured debt finance facilities worth $612m to develop the Kitsault molybdenum mine. Lenders include BNP Paribas, Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation, Export Development Canada, Korea Development Bank, Mizuho Bank and UniCredit Bank. The facility set out in the term sheet is comprised of $500m senior debt for a term of 10.5 years, $42m in equipment finance for a term of 5 years and $70m in the form of standby cost over-run facilities for a term of 8 years. The interest rate is LIBOR based, loan repayments are semi-annual or quarterly (for equipment finance) and there are mandatory prepayment provisions of a portion of excess free cash flow. The facility will include customary provisions for a financing of this type, including fees, representations and warranties, covenants, events of default and security customary for this type of financing - Jupiter Fund Management reports strong investment performance with assets under management rising to £33.1bn, with the asset manager benefitting from net mutual fund inflows of £875m over the first half of this year. The firm says it has maintained operating margins above 50%. Maarten Slendebroek, chief executive, says “We are pleased with the progress being made on the implementation of our growth strategy during the first half of 2014. The Board’s intention to increase cash returns to shareholders through a combination of ordinary and special dividends reflects this progress and confidence in our future growth potential. We believe this approach will allow shareholders to participate in our organic growth story while receiving an attractive yield.” There will be an analyst presentation to discuss the results on July 30th at 9.00am at FTI Consulting, 200 Aldersgate, Aldersgate Street, London, EC1A 4HD and is also accessible via a live audiocast for those unable to attend in person - CME Clearing says it will remove the Exchange-For-Swap (EFS) identifier for all NYMEX, COMEX and DME exchange futures executed in accordance with CME Rule 538 (Exchange for Related Positions). CME products were removed from EFS eligibility in October of 2010, and CBT products were removed from EFS eligibility in July of 2012. With this final transition, EFS will no longer be a supported transaction type at CME. The EFS transaction type has been harmonized into, and falls under, the Exchange for Risk (EFR) transaction referenced in Rule 538. EFR transactions are privately negotiated transactions (PNT) and include the simultaneous exchange of an Exchange futures position for a corresponding OTC swap or other OTC instrument. In addition, NYMEX, COMEX and DME exchange products will continue to be eligible for Exchange for Physical (EFP) and Exchange of Options for Options (EOO) privately negotiated transactions. Currently, an EFS transaction is represented as a TrdTyp=”12” on TrdCaptRpt messages. Effective on the above date, the TrdTyp value for these transactions should be submitted as “11” (EFR). CME Clearing will reject any NYMEX, COMEX, or DME exchange privately negotiated futures message sent as an EFS. The trade will subsequently need to be resubmitted with a valid transaction type to CME Clearing. Additionally, CME Clearing will re-categorize the Exchange of Options for Options (EOO) transaction type for all CME, CBOT, NYMEX, COMEX, and DME products. Currently, an EOO is represented as an option on an exchange for swap (EFS) in clearing and on FIXML TrdCaptRpt messages. Going forward, an EOO transaction will be represented as an option on an Exchange for Risk (EFR) - Chi-X® Japan Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of alternative market operator Chi-X® Global Holdings LLC, says local brokers Yamawa Securities Co., Ltd. and Ark Securities Co Ltd., have commenced trading on Chi-X Japan, bringing the total number of trading participants to 23. Yamawa Securities and Ark Securities will access its market centre through Intertrade’s platform - The upgrade of the cities of Bogota and Medellin by Moody’s follows the upgrade on Colombia's sovereign ratings and reflects the close economic and operational links that these cities have with the central government. The rating action also reflects Bogota and Medellin's relatively solid financial metrics and moderate debt levels. The ratings assigned to both Bogota and Medellin are supported by their strong economic position in Colombia that includes a high level of own-source revenues and diversified local economies. The positive prospects of economic growth in the country translate in supportive conditions for both cities through higher local economic growth and own-source revenue growth. The assigned ratings also consider the close oversight that Colombia's central government exerts over the country's regional and local governments. Bogota and Medellin show solid governance and management practices that have supported historical low to moderate debt levels and moderate cash financing requirements, says the ratings agency. Between 2011 and 2013, Bogota's cash financing requirements averaged -5.7% of total revenues and net direct and indirect debt averaged 18.4% of total revenues. Medellin's cash financing requirements over the same period averaged -5.8% of total revenues and debt levels averaged 17.6% of total revenues.

Is trustee confidence in managing DB risks waning?

Monday, 23 July 2012
Is trustee confidence in managing DB risks waning? As Defined Benefit (DB) scheme sponsors and trustees in the UK work to put their schemes on a more stable footing amid continued market volatility trustees' confidence in their ability to successfully manage the DB risks facing their plans may be waning, according to MetLife Assurance Limited’s 2012 UK Pension Risk Behaviour IndexSM (UK PRBI).   http://www.ftseglobalmarkets.com/

As Defined Benefit (DB) scheme sponsors and trustees in the UK work to put their schemes on a more stable footing amid continued market volatility trustees' confidence in their ability to successfully manage the DB risks facing their plans may be waning, according to MetLife Assurance Limited’s 2012 UK Pension Risk Behaviour IndexSM (UK PRBI).  

As Defined Benefit (DB) scheme sponsors and trustees in the UK work to put their schemes on a more stable footing amid continued market volatility, scheme trustees’ confidence in their ability to successfully manage the DB risks facing their plans may be waning, according to MetLife Assurance Limited’s 2012 UK Pension Risk Behaviour IndexSM (UK PRBI).   The study of 89 sponsors and trustees analysed how each group viewed 18 investment, liability and business risks that affect their pension schemes, and assessed how well they believed they were managing those risks.

The overall index value of the 2012 UK PRBI,which measures the importance that sponsors and trustees ascribe to each risk, their perceived success at managing each risk and the consistency between the two,remained consistent from 2011 to 2012 at 79 out of 100. However, the Index value for trustees fell another two points year-on-year to 78 in 2012 from 80 in 2011 and 82 in 2012. Conversely, the Index value for scheme sponsors is steadily rising, increasing by two points to 80, from 78 in 2011 and 75 in 2010. These movements, taken together, account for the overall 2012 Index value remaining level.

The drop in self-reported success at managing several key DB-related risks, including Scheme Governance and Inflation Risk, helps to partially explain the inverse relationship of the Index values between sponsors and trustees over the past three years.  In 2012, trustees rated their overall success at managing risks a 4 or 5 (out of a scale of 1-5, with 5 indicating success) 77% of the time, down from 80% in 2011 and 83% in 2010.

“Constant regulatory changes appear to undermine trustees’ confidence, as evidenced by the fall in the reported success of Scheme Governance and Inflation Risk.  Increasing levels of uncertainty being generated by issues such as Guaranteed Minimum Pension (GMP) Equalisation and Solvency II for pension schemes are impacting trustees’ confidence in managing some of the critical risks facing their schemes. Where once there was a degree of certainty, the revisiting of GMP Equalisation by the Department for Work and Pensions now requires that trustees again reconsider and tackle this issue,” holds Wayne Daniel, chief executive officer of MetLife Assurance Limited. 

Funding deficits is the most important risk facing scheme sponsors and trustees for the second year in a row, according to the 2012 UK PRBI. The ranking of Funding Deficits as the most important risk for the second year in a row reflects significant fluctuations in scheme assets and liabilities, mainly as a result of the volatility in equities and rising bond prices. At the same time, schemes may have also seen their liabilities grow due, in at least part, due to corporate bond and gilt yields, and continued uncertainty around the Eurozone.

Scheme sponsors and trustees continue to face unprecedented challenges on the economic and regulatory front. Volatile markets, driven in part by the Eurozone crisis, have demonstrated how quickly and significantly pension liabilities (and funding deficits) can change. "As a result, we expect sponsors and trustees to pay even greater attention to the connection between investment strategies and the risks that impact a scheme’s funding status. Additionally, scheme sponsors and trustees should consider incorporating triggers for de-risking the scheme in order to protect it.,” adds Daniel.

To ensure the viability of their schemes and safeguard members’ benefits, sponsors and trustees, says the report, are continuing to closely monitor the Employer Covenant. This risk ranked second among trustees for the second year in a row, and third among scheme sponsors.  Interestingly, the Importance Selection Rating, or the number of times the risk was selected by respondents when presented alongside other risk factors, for Employer Covenant is rising considerably among scheme sponsors: from 41% in 2011 to 49% in 2012. This may reflect the increased focus among scheme trustees on the Employer Covenant following The Pensions Regulator (TPR) guidance issued in November 2010.

The results of the 2012 UK PRBI demonstrate that scheme sponsors and trustees are continuing, and strengthening, their focus on a handful of key risks.  The overall Importance Rankings for the top four risks remained consistent from 2011 to 2012.

2012 vs. 2011 UK PRBI Overall Importance Ranking

RISK FACTOR                   

2012 RANKING

2011 RANKING

Funding Deficits

1

1

Employer Covenant

2

2

Asset and Liability Mismatch

3

3

Meeting Investment Return Targets

4

4

Measurement of Technical Provisions/Liabilities

5

7

In addition, the range between the Importance Selection Rates for the most important risk and least important risks this year is 66 percentage points, compared to 57 percentage points in 2011. This continues the trend established in the inaugural UK PRBI in 2010. 

Scheme sponsors and trustees continue to move toward a co-ordinated holistic approach to pension risk prioritisation, according to the 2012 UK PRBI. The importance rankings between trustees and sponsors are aligned within one or two ranking spots for all but one risk factor:  Asset Diversification. Trustees rank this fifth in importance whilst sponsors rank it 10th.

More details on the 2012 UK PRBI can be found at: www.metlifeassurance.co.uk/knowledge-centre/research

Related News

Related Articles

Related Blogs

Related Videos

Tweets by @DataLend

DataLend is a global securities finance market data provider covering 42,000+ unique securities globally with a total on-loan value of more than $1.8 trillion.

What do our tweets mean? See: http://bit.ly/18YlGjP